|
Free Newsletter |
Subscribe to our Free newsletter and you'll receive
- educational articles
- reports on topics and teaching techniques
to help with your success!
- notices to the
sales or discounts that I receive so you can go directly to
the savings!
We Respect Your Privacy |
|
|
|
Scrapbooking
Membership |
|
Scrapbooking is
wonderful educational and bonding experience with your children... get
your creative juices flowing and start a lifelong experience with your
kids today.
It's a FREE! newsletter!
Get all the details:
Click Here
|
|
Turning
Your Kitchen Into Your Classroom |
Working with your
child in the kitchen is a great way to not only spend time but to spend
time learning. Working with recipes in the kitchen can provide great
lessons in reading, math, science, sizes and shapes, and even organizing
and planning... don't under estimate the power of the kitchen in your
lesson plans. And now you can get a great cookbook and some super bonus
material to get you started and keep you going...
find out how
Click Here |
|
|
How I Started This Website |
|
|
Sugar
can cause degenerative disease, according to FDA,
but questionable statistics may lead to false sense of safety
In 1986, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) came out with a report
concerning the consumption of sugar in the United States, and whether
this consumption of sugar had ill effects on the health of the people.
The FDA based its conclusions on scientific research reported in medical
journals from around the world. The FDA did not do the research itself;
its
findings were based on research that others had done. One of the
conclusions of the report was that when sugar is eaten in large
quantities-25% to 50% or more of the dietary calories of humans or
animals the following conditions can develop: diabetes mellitus, glucose
intolerance (hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia), cardiovascular risk,
behavior changes, excess secretion of calcium in the urine, gallstones,
and
mineral deficiencies.
The report also concludes that sugar does not lead to these degenerative
diseases in the United States, because the average person does not eat
too much sugar. It states that the only adverse effect sugar has in this
country is to cause tooth decay.
The FDA said that the average person ate 40 pounds of sugar per person
in
the year 1985, which is equivalent to 12 teaspoons a day, or
approximately 8 to 12% of the daily calories from sugar. This report
noted that, in the United States, we manufactured 124 pounds of sugar
per person per year. So what happened to the extra 84 pounds of sugar
that we manufactured and did not eat? The report says this extra went to
dog food, export, storage, loss in shipment, handling and processing
and/or waste.
Not believing everything I read, I started to do my own research. I
telephoned the FDA and spoke to Dr. H. Irausquin, one of the people who
compiled the report. I asked Dr. Irausquin how the information was
obtained that each person ate 40 pounds of sugar each year. The
researcher told me that the method was not very scientific nor sound and
that, in the future, a better method would have to be found. A
questionnaire was sent to 5,000 people, asking them to keep a diet diary
of what they had consumed for the next week. The information was
obtained by these questionnaires.
I would like to quote Sidney Mintz, who wrote Sweetness and Power, on
this very subject. "One fascinating expression of this modern way of
eating
is found in what we know was consumed and what people recall they have
consumed. Whereas the Department of Agriculture figures demonstrate that
we dispose of about 3,200 calories per capita per day, the average white
female adult, for example, can recall, when asked what she ate on the
previous day, only 1560 calories, a noticeably low average, and less
than half the 'disappearance' figure. Since average weight loss has
risen steadily in this country, these recall data are difficult to
accept as accurate. They suggest a pattern of ragged and discontinuous
but very frequent snacks that are surely forgotten by those who do the
eating."
Still interested in this idea that we only eat 40 pounds of sugar per
person
per year, I phoned the Soft Drink Association. I spoke with Irene
Melvin,
who sent me a report titled " Estimated Annual Production and
Consumption
of Soft Drinks." The report showed that in 1985 we drank the equivalent
of
486.2 12-ounce cans of soft drinks per person. She said that of those
486.2 cans, 386 cans were with sugar. One hundred were sugar free.
Each sugary soft drink has approximately 10 teaspoons of sugar. After
doing a little math with my calculator, I realized that each person
drinks
approximately 11 teaspoons of sugar per person per day in soft drinks
alone.
If we only eat 40 pounds of sugar per person per year, which is
equivalent to 12 teaspoons a day, we would only have one teaspoon a day
left for cookies, candy, cake, pie, ice cream, fruit yogurt, ketchup and
other sugary foods. I believe that the FDA has made a gross mistake in
calculating that we eat only 40 pounds of sugar per person per year.
By every other source that I have read, the average American consumed
over 120 pounds of sugar per year at that time.
The University of California, Berkeley Wellness Letter reported the
largest amount of sugar consumed per person per year. The Letter
reported that each American consumed about 133 pounds of sugar each year
at that time. That amount accounts for 20 to 25% of all calories and
500-600 calories per person per day. The average teenage boy eats twice
that amount of sugar.If the U.C. Berkeley Wellness Letter is correct
that the amount of sugar we consume is approximately 133 pounds per
person per year, then sugar does lead to degenerative diseases as
reported by the FDA in their report.
I was delighted to see that most of the FDA report focused on the
research from around the world that shows sugar does cause disease when
eaten in large quantities. They did a superb job of documenting this,
and I commend them. The total report was 152 pages long. Of those 152
pages, 118 pages were from world research which directly correlated that
when the consumption of sugar reached 20 to 25% of a person's diet,
people began to develop medical problems. Thus, the FDA spent most of
the report showing that sugar does cause disease. The only mistake the
FDA made was to miscalculate the amount of sugar we eat each year. The
charts were excellent and the bibliography was clear and precise. In the
amounts that we eat sugar today, approximately 133 pounds per person per
year, sugar is a problem for many people. I recommend that everyone read
this report and draw their own conclusions.
This report can be read in the Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 116, No. 11S,
November 1986 Supplement, or obtained for $15.00 from the American
Institute of Nutrition in Washington, DC, in a different form but the
same
information.
In my book, Lick the Sugar Habit, I explain the biochemical pathway that
sugar takes in the body, how it upsets the delicate mineral balance so
that
mineral dependent enzymes are unable to function optimally, food does
not
all digest, and undigested food gets into the bloodstream causing havoc
in
the body and an immune response. Over a period of time, the immune
system cannot continue to make this response and becomes exhausted. The
exhaustion of the immune system leads to the degenerative disease
process.
It just depends on a person's genetic blueprints as to what disease will
develop. Unfortunately it is not only sugar that upsets the body
chemistry but also distress, anger, depression, caffeine, alcohol,
rancid overcooked fats, overeating, street drugs, and many
over-the-counter and prescriptions drugs.
All of these things take the same biochemical pathway in the body that
sugar does. So eating a little sugar, being a little depressed, having a
beer and some French fries can more than upset the body chemistry, and
this in turn, over a period of time, causes disease. The research that
the FDA showed only included sugar. If the researchers had also
distressed the subjects, along with giving them sugar and possibly
rancid fats, I believe the research would have shown that the subject
would have developed cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus or other
diseases that were discussed in the report with the far less sugar.
It would have become metabolic overload with two or more different
stressors. So sugar and other abusive foods do play a role in the
degenerative disease process. Any person with symptoms such as
allergies, headaches, arthritis, high blood pressure, yeast infections,
canker sores, fatigue, falling alseep after meals, cancer, AIDS or any
other degenerative disease would be helped by removing abusive foods and
not letting stress become distress.
Nancy Appleton, Ph.D., did her undergraduate work at U.C.L.A. in Food
and Nutrition and received her Ph.D. from Walden University in Health
Services. She is the author of the new book The Curse of Louis Pasteur,
available through her web site:
www.nancyappleton.com She is
also author
of Lick the Sugar Habit, The Secrets of Natural Healing with Food, and
Healthy Bones.
Visit
www.HowtoLearn.com/add-adhd.html
for more information about the
healthy foods your child can eat to help calm them down and allow for
greater learning capacity in school and life!
REFERENCES:
| |
Glinsmann, Walter H., M.D., Irausquin, H.,
Ph.D., and Park, Youngmee
K., Ph.D. Evaluation of Health Aspects of Sugars Contained in
Carbohydrate Sweetners. Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 200 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20204. |
| |
Ibid, pp. 60-76 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 41-59 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 115-127 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 128-133 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 139-141 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 141 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 141 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 39 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 7 |
| |
Ibid, pp. 6 |
| |
Mintz, Sidney, Sweetness and Power, New
York: Viking Penguin Press,
1985, p. 205 |
| |
"Estimated Annual Production and
Consumption of Soft Drinks," Soft
Drink Association, 1101 16th St. NW, Washinton, DC 20036 |
| |
University of California, Berkeley
Wellness Letter. 6:3 (Dec. 1989) pp.
4-5 |
|
|